The Offense of “Kidult”: Beyond Conventional Labels

Passions weave a colorful array of experiences that shape individual identities. Yet, within societal discourse, labels often confine and diminish these passions, none more controversial than the term “Kidult.” While ostensibly a blend of “kid” and “adult,” this term carries an undertone that is both dismissive and offensive, casting judgment on adults who embrace hobbies, interests, or behaviours traditionally associated with childhood.

The word “Kidult” insidiously suggests a lack of maturity or seriousness in adults who engage in activities deemed as childish. It tends to belittle or trivialise their interests, branding them as unable or unwilling to embrace adulthood. The implicit judgment embedded in this term undermines the autonomy of individuals and perpetuates societal norms that dictate what is deemed appropriate for different age groups.

The offense lies in the inherent stereotyping and pigeonholing of adults based on their preferences. It disregards the rich complexity of human nature and the multifaceted reasons behind one’s hobbies or interests. From collecting toys and playing video games to enjoying animated movies or participating in hobbies like cosplay, the spectrum of “kidult” interests is vast and diverse. These activities often hold sentimental value, nostalgia, or simply serve as a source of joy and stress relief for individuals.

Moreover, the term “Kidult” implies a false binary between childhood and adulthood, disregarding the fluidity of personal…